Skip to content
For laboratory research use only · Not for human consumption
Pioneer Labs

Fragments / Research guide

Semax.

A little deeper. A clearer picture.

An ACTH-fragment-inspired peptide with a Pro–Gly–Pro extension. Semax combines two short sequence regions into a single seven-residue chain.

For research use onlyView Semax sizes
Published by Pioneer LabsUpdated Sources & editorial standards

01 / Comparison

Semax vs Selank, side by side.

Semax and Selank are both seven-residue chains that end in Pro–Gly–Pro. Their first four residues differ: Semax begins with Met–Glu–His–Phe, the ACTH(4–7) segment, and Selank with Thr–Lys–Pro–Arg, the tuftsin sequence.

Semax and Selank sequences
SemaxSelank
Sequence, one-letterMEHFPGPTKPRPGP
Sequence, three-letterMet–Glu–His–Phe–Pro–Gly–ProThr–Lys–Pro–Arg–Pro–Gly–Pro
Length7 residues7 residues
Residues 1–4Met–Glu–His–Phe, ACTH(4–7)Thr–Lys–Pro–Arg, tuftsin
Residues 5–7Pro–Gly–ProPro–Gly–Pro
Formula, free peptideC37H51N9O10SC33H57N11O9
Molecular weight, free peptide813.9 g/mol751.9 g/mol
PubChem CID981110211765600
Reference values from public records, not a Pioneer lot specification.

References: [1][2][3][4]

02 / Molecular architecture

A closer look at the chain.

Met–Glu–His–Phe corresponds to ACTH residues 4–7. Pro–Gly–Pro completes the chain. Being derived from part of ACTH does not make Semax the full ACTH hormone.

Pioneer / Reference notesMolecular features
  • 7 amino acids
  • ACTH(4–7) segment
  • Pro–Gly–Pro extension
  1. Met
  2. Glu
  3. His
  4. Phe
  5. Pro
  6. Gly
  7. Pro
MEHFPGP reference sequence. This represents residue order, not the molecule’s folded shape.

Reference information: [1][2][3][4]. Actual lot identity must be verified separately.

What ACTH(4–7) means in this name.

The parenthetical positions identify the Met–Glu–His–Phe segment from the ACTH reference. Pro–Gly–Pro follows it in Semax. These positions describe a relationship to the parent sequence; they are not the total length of Semax, whose reference chain contains seven residues.

Sequence blocks are not blended ingredients.

Breaking MEHFPGP into MEHF and PGP is a way to explain the design. In the reference structure, the residues belong to one linked backbone. That is different from combining two separate fragment materials, even if a component list contained the same residue names.

Structure and research references: [1][2][3][4]

03 / Read the evidence

Research & analytical context.

The NLM identity record describes the ACTH(4–7)-Pro–Gly–Pro sequence. The two sequence regions form one molecule, rather than a mixture of separate peptide fragments. Molecular identity depends on the complete chain.

Read the references: [1][2][3][4].

The distinction that matters

Semax and Selank share a Pro–Gly–Pro ending but have different preceding residues. That shared ending does not make them the same compound.

04 / From reference to record

Know the lot, too.

A publication describes its own test material. Your lot’s certificate describes what was tested on that lot. Keep the compound name, batch number and reported methods together when reviewing a result.

Identity & composition

Check sequence or chemical form, terminal modifications, counterion and—where relevant—each blend component.

Analytical results

Read purity, content, sterility and endotoxin results as separate measurements. Only call a test passed when the actual report supports it.

Handling & storage notes

Lyophilized material: Store at −20°C; protect from light and moisture.

Follow the material-specific label and supporting storage documentation. These temperatures do not establish a shelf life.

How to store lyophilized peptides

05 / Reference questions

A few details, explained.

Does Semax contain the complete ACTH sequence?

No. The reference uses the ACTH(4–7)-related segment followed by Pro–Gly–Pro. The complete ACTH chain is a different molecular identity.

How does Semax differ from Selank?

Both are seven-residue chains ending in Pro–Gly–Pro. Semax begins with Met–Glu–His–Phe and Selank with Thr–Lys–Pro–Arg, so they match at three of seven positions, all in the ending. The comparison is structural, not a claim that the two behave the same way experimentally.

Read alongside the references: [1][2][3][4]

06 / Continue reading

Go to the source.